Porter on Women of Distance
The source attributes a 2024 women’s 817-mile FKT of 16d 22h 6m to Georgia Porter, without a support category.
Route
The Arizona National Scenic Trail is a non-motorized route stretching roughly 800 miles across Arizona from Mexico to Utah, linking deserts, mountains, canyons and forests.
7 TUM reports · Published coverage below
Publication history
4 editorial issues
Distinct issues per publication month. Each issue counts once.
Monthly editorial issue counts: Jul 2024: 0; Aug 2024: 0; Sep 2024: 0; Oct 2024: 0; Nov 2024: 2; Dec 2024: 0; Jan 2025: 1; Feb 2025: 0; Mar 2025: 1; Apr 2025: 0; May 2025: 0; Jun 2025: 0; Jul 2025: 0; Aug 2025: 0; Sep 2025: 0; Oct 2025: 0; Nov 2025: 0; Dec 2025: 0; Jan 2026: 0; Feb 2026: 0; Mar 2026: 0; Apr 2026: 0; May 2026: 0; Jun 2026: 0; Jul 2026: 0; Aug 2026: 0; Sep 2026: 0; Oct 2026: 0; Nov 2026: 0.
Sponsor mentions, repeated links and polls are excluded. Credits within editorial items may count. Read the supporting timeline ↓
Newest first
The source attributes a 2024 women’s 817-mile FKT of 16d 22h 6m to Georgia Porter, without a support category.
TUM highlighted Fastest Known Time’s 2024 countdown: Krupicka, Hegemann, Sansone/Hamilton at number5; Power/Fowler at4; Porter/Curtin at3; Anderson/Peterson at2. These are annual-list positions, not race podiums or interchangeable current FKT categories. The source specifically described Fowler’s Arizona Trail effort as self-supported; number one had not yet been revealed.
Event date: 2024 · TUM publication: January 2, 2025
TUM pictured Porter at the southern terminus after the effort described in the feature as a women’s supported record.
TUM reported Porter’s women’s supported completion on November 14 and separately referenced Fowler’s overall mark; those are distinct categories.
Event date: November 14, 2024 · TUM publication: November 19, 2024
The gallery distinguishes Fowler’s self-supported effort from the supported benchmark.
TUM reported Fowler covering 817 miles of the Arizona Trail in 12 days, 17 hours and 33 minutes, self-supported. An initial stopped attempt and the subsequent restart are separate parts of his account.
TUM distinguished Fowler’s self-supported completion, McConaughy’s supported 2022 benchmark and Porter’s ongoing women’s supported attempt.
TUM repeated the link to Fowler’s Arizona Trail account.
2024 women’s FKT attributed to Porter
Women of Distance interviewed Georgia Porter. The issue recalled her 2024 women’s Arizona Trail FKT of 817 miles in 16 days, 22 hours and 6 minutes.
SourceRoute of the separately referenced overall FKT
TUM reported Georgia Porter’s 817-mile Arizona Trail completion in 16 days, 22 hours and 6 minutes, finishing at 4:07 a.m. on November 14, 2024. It identified the women’s supported category and separately linked Nick Fowler’s reported overall FKT.
SourceMcConaughy’s historical supported effort
TUM compared Fowler’s self-supported completion with McConaughy’s supported 2022 record. Porter was still attempting the women’s supported mark, with 150 miles remaining and Galerakis’s 17 days, 11 hours as the target.
SourceGalerakis’s historical supported benchmark
TUM compared Fowler’s self-supported completion with McConaughy’s supported 2022 record. Porter was still attempting the women’s supported mark, with 150 miles remaining and Galerakis’s 17 days, 11 hours as the target.
SourceFacts above link directly to their sources. Published TUM dates and public-source check dates describe different things.
Public background sources checked October 29, 2026. The selection contains 127 published issues.
Background context from one original public source. TUM’s dated reporting appears below.
This is a limited background snapshot, checked October 29, 2026. Source publication dates and event dates are shown separately.
Published article, 2025-03-28T12:27:27.418Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-28T23:18:25.979Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2025-01-02T23:04:55.958Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-30T08:39:44.975Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2024-11-19T23:15:57.618Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-30T10:54:29.265Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2024-11-12T22:16:57.079Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-30T10:54:29.327Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.