Cactus Rose 100 unofficial results
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
Race
Cactus Rose 100 is the hundred-mile distance at Tejas Trails’ Cactus Rose event in Texas’ Hill Country State Natural Area near Bandera. Its rugged course uses repeated 25-mile loops and a self-support format.
2 TUM reports · Published coverage below
Publication history
2 editorial issues
Distinct issues per publication month. Each issue counts once.
Monthly editorial issue counts: Jul 2024: 0; Aug 2024: 0; Sep 2024: 0; Oct 2024: 0; Nov 2024: 0; Dec 2024: 0; Jan 2025: 0; Feb 2025: 0; Mar 2025: 0; Apr 2025: 0; May 2025: 0; Jun 2025: 0; Jul 2025: 0; Aug 2025: 0; Sep 2025: 0; Oct 2025: 1; Nov 2025: 0; Dec 2025: 0; Jan 2026: 0; Feb 2026: 0; Mar 2026: 0; Apr 2026: 0; May 2026: 0; Jun 2026: 0; Jul 2026: 0; Aug 2026: 0; Sep 2026: 0; Oct 2026: 1; Nov 2026: 0.
Sponsor mentions, repeated links and polls are excluded. Credits within editorial items may count. Read the supporting timeline ↓
Newest first
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
TUM reported Philip Arneson and Madeline Green winning Cactus Rose 100 after a venue change to Camp Eagle.
Event date: 2025 · TUM publication: October 30, 2025
Philip Arneson · Won Cactus Rose 100 in 22:43:50 according to explicitly unofficial results.
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
SourceEsther Hackleman · Won the women’s Cactus Rose 100 race and finished third overall according to unofficial results; women occupied four of the top six places.
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
SourceStuart Job · Finished second among the men at Cactus Rose 100 in the unofficial results.
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
SourceDerek Ezell · Completed the unofficial Cactus Rose 100 men’s podium in third.
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
SourceSource publication dates distinguish reporting from event dates.
Reported 2026-10-26
TUM’s explicitly unofficial Cactus Rose 100 results named Arneson men’s winner in 22:43:50 and Hackleman women’s winner/third overall. Scott Baldridge’s dated result is retained without personal/medical biography.
TUM · Oct 26, 2026Facts above link directly to their sources. Published TUM dates and public-source check dates describe different things.
Public background sources checked October 26, 2026. The selection contains 127 published issues.
Background context from one original public source. TUM’s dated reporting appears below.
This is a limited background snapshot, checked October 26, 2026. Source publication dates and event dates are shown separately.
Published article, 2026-10-26T20:52:03.372Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-26T20:55:46.170Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2025-10-30T12:31:52.975Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-27T18:56:10.738Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.