McKnight’s disclosure and differing anti-doping views
The July 14 interview with McKnight was the setting of McKnight’s stated BPC-157 disclosure.
Person
Cameron Hanes hosts the Keep Hammering Collective podcast. His public website combines guest conversations with accounts of his own running, including a personal-record announcement at the Eugene Marathon.
8 TUM reports · Published coverage below
Publication history
8 editorial issues
Distinct issues per publication month. Each issue counts once.
Monthly editorial issue counts: Jul 2024: 0; Aug 2024: 0; Sep 2024: 0; Oct 2024: 0; Nov 2024: 0; Dec 2024: 0; Jan 2025: 0; Feb 2025: 0; Mar 2025: 0; Apr 2025: 1; May 2025: 1; Jun 2025: 0; Jul 2025: 0; Aug 2025: 0; Sep 2025: 0; Oct 2025: 0; Nov 2025: 0; Dec 2025: 0; Jan 2026: 0; Feb 2026: 0; Mar 2026: 0; Apr 2026: 0; May 2026: 4; Jun 2026: 1; Jul 2026: 1; Aug 2026: 0; Sep 2026: 0; Oct 2026: 0; Nov 2026: 0.
Sponsor mentions, repeated links and polls are excluded. Credits within editorial items may count. Read the supporting timeline ↓
Newest first
The July 14 interview with McKnight was the setting of McKnight’s stated BPC-157 disclosure.
Cameron Hanes: Named in attributed essay/promotion/dispute; no adjudicated claim.
Case demonstrated following anti-doping rules; Puzey advocated civil discussion after speaking with Cameron Hanes and Canaday. The account does not establish an adjudicated violation or a personal or medical finding.
Hanes was a subject of a Nobody Asked Us discussion of an anti-doping dispute with Sage Canaday; the item does not establish an adjudicated violation or his presence on the episode.
TUM reported the peptide dispute involving Hanes, explicitly stating that he had not been charged, his Eugene result stood, and the reported complaint did not allege use at Eugene specifically.
TUM reported Cameron Hanes as a Cocodona DNF; no finish or current health conclusion is inferred.
Podcast host Cameron Hanes finished eighteenth at Cocodona in 2025, as reported in TUM’s recap.
A newly linked video followed Courtney Dauwalter and Cameron Hanes over 100 miles in three days. The accompanying podcast had appeared a couple of months earlier.
The most-viewed module repeated Amanda Sapp’s article about Cameron Hanes and Sage Canaday. It adds no new result or fresh biographical claim.
Interview participant in this dated account
Said he had disclosed taking BPC-157 last winter in his July 14 interview with Cameron Hanes; the issue placed that self-disclosure beside anti-doping guidance and differing opinions.
SourceNamed in attributed essay/promotion/dispute; no adjudicated claim
Amanda Sapp published an essay about classism and gatekeeping in running, Cameron Hanes promoted it, and Sage Canaday disputed statements about his family and background. These remain the authors’ attributed positions; TUM does not adjudicate them or add personal claims.
SourceSubject of a Nobody Asked Us anti-doping discussion
Des Linden and Kara Goucher discussed the Cam Hanes–Sage Canaday anti-doping dispute on Nobody Asked Us. TUM also linked Linden’s own comments about professional and amateur participation; the item presents attributed discussion and opinion, without establishing an adjudicated violation.
SourceRecorded a podcast and running video with Courtney Dauwalter
A newly linked video followed Courtney Dauwalter and Cameron Hanes over 100 miles in three days. The accompanying podcast had appeared a couple of months earlier.
SourceResults, plans and personal accounts retain their source dates.
Reported 2026-06-08
Named in a relinked article by Amanda Sapp. A carryover link is not fresh biographical reporting.
TUM · Jun 8, 2026Reported 2026-06-05
Promoted Sapp’s essay; Canaday disputed its statements about his own family/background. No third-party claims are adjudicated here.
TUM · Jun 5, 2026Reported 2026-05-30
Case demonstrated following anti-doping rules; Puzey advocated civil discussion after speaking with Cameron Hanes and Canaday. The account does not establish an adjudicated violation or a personal or medical finding.
TUM · May 30, 2026Reported 2026-05-21
Hanes was a subject of a Nobody Asked Us discussion of an anti-doping dispute with Sage Canaday; the item does not establish an adjudicated violation or his presence on the episode.
TUM · May 21, 2026Facts above link directly to their sources. Published TUM dates and public-source check dates describe different things.
Public background sources checked October 20, 2026. The selection contains 127 published issues.
Career context from one original public source. TUM’s dated reporting appears below.
This is a limited career snapshot, checked October 20, 2026. Source publication dates and event dates are shown separately.
Published article, 2026-07-22T13:29:00Z. Archived published text is pinned to canonical main 002146376c24.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-08T15:52:22.550Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T14:51:35.957Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-05T10:34:52.265Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T19:24:29.682Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-30T13:35:08.243Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T21:15:43.963Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-21T04:13:04.643Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-23T01:32:51.613Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-20T06:38:01.226Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-25T00:14:26.912Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-07T05:45:12.790Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-27T18:56:10.725Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2025-05-09T21:36:15.363Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-28T02:39:04.258Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Published article, 2025-04-25T16:49:24.244Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-28T23:18:26.064Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.