Athlete
Erin Ton pursues high-altitude fastest-known-time projects. In an interview with Heather Anderson, she discussed South American mountain ascents including Aconcagua, along with the training and motivation behind those efforts.
5 TUM reports · Published coverage below
Publication history
5 editorial issues
Distinct issues per publication month. Each issue counts once.
Monthly editorial issue counts: Jul 2024: 0; Aug 2024: 0; Sep 2024: 0; Oct 2024: 0; Nov 2024: 0; Dec 2024: 0; Jan 2025: 0; Feb 2025: 0; Mar 2025: 0; Apr 2025: 0; May 2025: 0; Jun 2025: 0; Jul 2025: 0; Aug 2025: 0; Sep 2025: 0; Oct 2025: 0; Nov 2025: 0; Dec 2025: 0; Jan 2026: 0; Feb 2026: 0; Mar 2026: 0; Apr 2026: 0; May 2026: 0; Jun 2026: 3; Jul 2026: 0; Aug 2026: 0; Sep 2026: 1; Oct 2026: 1; Nov 2026: 0.
Sponsor mentions, repeated links and polls are excluded. Credits within editorial items may count. Read the supporting timeline ↓
Newest first
Erin Ton reported a women’s Half Dome round trip, with 3:12:17 elapsed on Strava. TUM compared it with separately listed supported and unsupported cables-route marks. Her reported attempt is distinct from formal FKT verification or a confirmed support category.
Ton reported ascent and round-trip times from Mweka Gate faster than the listed women’s supported marks. The item attributes the claims to her post.
Erin Ton: Reported women’s ascent 1:31; attributed mixedteam claim.
Erin Ton: Claimed women’s ascent 1:15 and round-trip 2:11; separate categories.
Erin Ton reported a women’s Mount McLoughlin ascent mark of1:20. It is an attributed ascent-only claim, with support style and ratification unstated.
Original public source
Heather Anderson’s original FKT interview provides mountain-project and training context.
Fastest Known Time
Reported ascent and round-trip marks
Ton reported ascent and round-trip times from Mweka Gate faster than the listed women’s supported marks. The item attributes the claims to her post.
SourceAthlete-reported women’s FKT: 3:12:17 elapsed; formal listing/support category unconfirmed
Erin Ton reported a women’s Half Dome round trip, with 3:12:17 elapsed on Strava. TUM compared it with separately listed supported and unsupported cables-route marks. Her reported attempt is distinct from formal FKT verification or a confirmed support category.
SourceReported women’s ascent 1:31; attributed mixedteam claim
Erin Ton reported a women’s ascent mark of 1:31, joined by Chris Fisher for what she called a mixed-gender team record. Both claims remain attributed to her account.
SourceClaimed women’s ascent 1:15 and round-trip 2:11; separate categories
Erin Ton reported women’s ascent and round-trip marks of 1:15 and 2:11 after an icy scouting day. They are separate attributed categories, with no support style or formal ratification established here.
SourceReporting dates distinguish results, plans and later updates.
Reported 2026-06-15
Reported a women’s ascent mark of 1:31 and a mixed-team claim with Chris Fisher. The account does not establish descent, support style or formal ratification.
TUM · Jun 15, 2026Reported 2026-06-12
Reported separate women’s ascent and round-trip claims of 1:15 and 2:11. These attributed June claims do not establish support style, a precise day or formal ratification.
TUM · Jun 12, 2026Reported 2026-06-05
Reported a women’s ascent mark of1:20. The account does not establish a round-trip time or formal category.
TUM · Jun 5, 2026Facts above link directly to their sources. Published TUM dates and public-source check dates describe different things.
Public background sources checked October 20, 2026. The selection contains 127 published issues.
The October 20 Half Dome account is an athlete-reported FKT with elapsed Strava time. Formal listing and the exact supported/unsupported category were not established.
Career context from one original public source. TUM’s dated reporting appears below.
This is a limited career snapshot, checked October 20, 2026. Source publication dates and event dates are shown separately.
Published article, 2026-09-07T18:58:38Z. Archived published text is pinned to canonical main 032eba22cd61.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact destination preserved from the published item. Supports the item’s original attribution; not a claim that its current state was freshly checked.
Published article, 2026-10-20T13:08:21Z. Archived published text is pinned to canonical main 002146376c24.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-15T14:52:54.105Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-21T01:02:44.782Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-12T16:00:05.047Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-21T03:28:54.859Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-05T10:34:52.265Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T19:24:29.682Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
