Sage Canaday is a running coach and Higher Running co-founder with experience in road marathons and mountain, ultra and trail racing. His coaching biography describes that range of disciplines, giving context to his public commentary on the sport.
Distinct issues per publication month. Each issue counts once.
Jul 2024Peak 4Nov 2026
Monthly editorial issue counts: Jul 2024: 0; Aug 2024: 0; Sep 2024: 0; Oct 2024: 0; Nov 2024: 0; Dec 2024: 0; Jan 2025: 0; Feb 2025: 0; Mar 2025: 0; Apr 2025: 0; May 2025: 0; Jun 2025: 0; Jul 2025: 0; Aug 2025: 1; Sep 2025: 0; Oct 2025: 0; Nov 2025: 0; Dec 2025: 0; Jan 2026: 0; Feb 2026: 0; Mar 2026: 0; Apr 2026: 0; May 2026: 4; Jun 2026: 2; Jul 2026: 2; Aug 2026: 0; Sep 2026: 0; Oct 2026: 0; Nov 2026: 0.
Sponsor mentions, repeated links and polls are excluded. Credits within editorial items may count. Read the supporting timeline ↓
In The Ultra Minute
Newest first
Published in TUM
Bitter and Canaday on anti-doping education and rules
Zach Bitter argued for education about anti-doping complexity; Sage Canaday argued for applying published rules consistently and disclosing biases. These are attributed views, not allegations of a violation.
McKnight’s disclosure and differing anti-doping views
Argued that race entrants should follow the same prohibited-substance rules, with enforcement focused first on podium contenders, sponsored runners, coaches and influencers.
Case demonstrated following anti-doping rules; Puzey advocated civil discussion after speaking with Cameron Hanes and Canaday. The account does not establish an adjudicated violation or a personal or medical finding.
Nobody Asked Us discusses anti-doping rules and the Hanes–Canaday dispute
Canaday was a subject of a Nobody Asked Us discussion of an anti-doping dispute with Cam Hanes; the item does not establish his presence on the episode.
TUM reported Canaday’s stated complaint about the Hanes peptide dispute, while retaining the explicit absence of a charge or a specific allegation about Eugene.
Amanda Sapp published an essay about classism and gatekeeping in running, Cameron Hanes promoted it, and Sage Canaday disputed statements about his family and background. These remain the authors’ attributed positions; TUM does not adjudicate them or add personal claims.
The 2027 lottery reported 1,985 verified applicants for 475 places and named selected runners. Applicant demographics and projected women’s draw are distinct from an actual starting field; the shorter-distance June 3–6 registration announcements are separate from finishes.
Des Linden and Kara Goucher discussed the Cam Hanes–Sage Canaday anti-doping dispute on Nobody Asked Us. TUM also linked Linden’s own comments about professional and amateur participation; the item presents attributed discussion and opinion, without establishing an adjudicated violation.
TUM reported Daniel Jones’s UTA50 win in 4:04:11, Hajime Kasagi second in 4:15:59 and Blake Turner third in 4:18:05. Sage Canaday’s top-ten/age-group result and OCC qualification are separate; Hiroki Kai was noted on a future Western States entrants list.
Nobody Asked Us discusses anti-doping rules and the Hanes–Canaday dispute
Canaday was a subject of a Nobody Asked Us discussion of an anti-doping dispute with Cam Hanes; the item does not establish his presence on the episode.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-08T15:52:22.550Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T14:51:35.957Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-05T10:34:52.265Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T19:24:29.682Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-06-03T14:05:19.250Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T21:15:43.944Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-30T13:35:08.243Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-22T21:15:43.963Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-21T04:13:04.643Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-23T01:32:51.613Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-20T06:38:01.226Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-25T00:14:26.912Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2026-05-17T06:12:01.795Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-25T00:14:26.840Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.
Published article, 2025-08-02T11:26:18.233Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-27T22:18:13.835Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.