Nott’s reported Badwater age-group record
TUM reported a 2024 Badwater men’s 60–69 record of 29:22:48, improving the mark it dated to 2012.
Event date: 2024 · TUM publication: July 29, 2024
Athlete
Todd Nott is an American ultrarunner and repeat Badwater 135 participant. His official athlete history spans several editions, including a 2024 finish and a 2025 did-not-finish result.
1 TUM report · Published coverage below
Publication history
1 editorial issue
Distinct issues per publication month. Each issue counts once.
Monthly editorial issue counts: Jul 2024: 1; Aug 2024: 0; Sep 2024: 0; Oct 2024: 0; Nov 2024: 0; Dec 2024: 0; Jan 2025: 0; Feb 2025: 0; Mar 2025: 0; Apr 2025: 0; May 2025: 0; Jun 2025: 0; Jul 2025: 0; Aug 2025: 0; Sep 2025: 0; Oct 2025: 0; Nov 2025: 0; Dec 2025: 0; Jan 2026: 0; Feb 2026: 0; Mar 2026: 0; Apr 2026: 0; May 2026: 0; Jun 2026: 0; Jul 2026: 0; Aug 2026: 0; Sep 2026: 0; Oct 2026: 0; Nov 2026: 0.
Sponsor mentions, repeated links and polls are excluded. Credits within editorial items may count. Read the supporting timeline ↓
Newest first
TUM reported a 2024 Badwater men’s 60–69 record of 29:22:48, improving the mark it dated to 2012.
Event date: 2024 · TUM publication: July 29, 2024
Facts above link directly to their sources. Published TUM dates and public-source check dates describe different things.
Public background sources checked October 30, 2026. The selection contains 127 published issues.
The2024Badwater report concerns the men’s60–69mark, not an overall win or a record asserted current today. The organizer’s2025DNF is a separate edition and supplies no withdrawal cause here.
Career context from one original public source. TUM’s dated reporting appears below.
This is a limited career snapshot, checked October 30, 2026. Source publication dates and event dates are shown separately.
Published article, 2024-07-29T14:07:40.458Z. Public original captured at 2026-10-30T17:04:58.576Z and projected to reviewed article text; no publishing-repository text pin is claimed.
Exact public destination in the published item. The archived TUM issue establishes the historical attribution; this is not a fresh verification of the destination’s current content.